Dear people of the Commonwealth,

On November 23, many of us will be going to the polls to cast our votes for the governor and lieutenant governor who will lead the CNMI for the next five years.  At the end of the day, the decisions we make in the polling booth are ours alone.  Our votes do not belong to any political party, candidate, family member, friend, or employer.  We owe it to ourselves not to blindly follow the instructions or endorsements of others, nor to simply accept smear campaigns or slogans as substitutes for the truth and our own experiences. 

Each of us is responsible for opening our own eyes, doing our own research, and making well-informed and intelligent decisions when we vote. 

The tone of the 2009 election season has generally reflected the deep malaise that has afflicted the CNMI these past four years, and the anxiety with which many of us now face the future.  But let us not be ruled by fear on November 23 – neither fear of change, nor fear of the status quo.  Let us go to the polls with courage and with open eyes, aware of the records, platforms, and characters of both gubernatorial teams, and cognizant of our aspirations for the future of the CNMI and the candidates who would carry those aspirations into action.

After having done my own research on the candidates, and having reflected on my core values, my experiences and quality of life these past four years, and my hopes for the future, I have decided to cast my vote for Heinz Hofschneider and Arnold Palacios.  I think new leadership and a change at the helm would do us good.  And I would like to now specifically address the common question that has been asked by supporters of the Fitial administration:  “Change for what?” 

To call for “change” means not only that we must judge the record of the incumbent administration and the implications of extending the status quo, but more importantly that we must articulate the qualities of leadership that we want in our next governor that are lacking in the current administration.  It is not enough to vote against.  We must also know what we are voting for. 

And so, when I say I want change, I mean that I want a governor and lieutenant governor who:

n      Respect the rule of law, and the checks and balances of government, and would never abuse their power and declare emergencies in order to circumvent laws and regulations they do not like;

n      Appoint highly-qualified people of integrity to their Cabinet, and to critical government boards and commissions;

n      Prioritize decent healthcare for our people, and would never tolerate nor make excuses for the unstable leadership and neglect that have resulted in the hospital’s present state of disarray;

n      Prioritize stable, reliable, and affordable utilities, and full compliance with the federal stipulated orders for clean water, a functioning wastewater system, and an acceptable system of used oil management;

n      Are committed to paying government contributions to the Retirement Fund in full and on-time, and would never have to be sued in order to be forced to finally make payments;

n      Take the Open Government Act seriously, and would never have to be sued by any citizen in order to disclose expenditures and sources of public funds;

n      Value good working relations with the federal government, and negotiation rather than an adversarial or litigious relationship;

n      Believe in decent wages and fair labor standards for all the CNMI’s residents;

n      Make no excuses and show no tolerance for public corruption, drug use and drug trafficking, human trafficking, and labor abuse;

n      Are truly committed to the restoration of the merit-based civil service system, and the implementation of an independent desk audit;

n      Value the environment for the sake of public health, our tourism economy, and future generations, and would ensure strict adherence to environmental laws and regulations;  

n      Respect freedom of speech, and would never pressure a private company to terminate employees because of their political activities, nor terminate or refuse to renew the contracts of qualified public servants who are suspected of “disloyalty,” nor tell law-abiding foreign residents who are exercising their civil rights that they are “illegals who must be deported immediately”;

n      Take public safety and the prosecution of crime seriously, and would never politicize the Department of Public Safety nor fail to formally appoint an Attorney General for an entire year;

n      Recognize the importance of fair bidding and hiring for the efficient and effective provision of public services, and would never sole-source lucrative contracts to friends, or use government jobs as a tool to entrench political power;

n      Believe in the wise stewardship of public lands, and would appoint a Secretary and advisory board that would prioritize the adoption of a responsible, credible and professional public land use plan, in accordance with the Constitution;

n      Understand that proper planning and professional leadership,  not day-to-day crisis management, are critical to the provision of essential public services, the implementation of critical infrastructure projects, and the cohesive enforcement of the programs, policies, and laws of the CNMI;

n      Possess the ability to listen thoughtfully and respectfully to people of diverse views and backgrounds, to acknowledge past mistakes, and to accept criticism gracefully; and

n      Appeal to the best in people, and bring to the table a positive and inspiring vision of good governance, restored credibility, a revitalized and diversified economy, a skilled workforce, a clean environment, a healthy community, safe neighborhoods, excellent schools, and retirement security.

These are all the qualities of leadership that I want in our next governor and lieutenant governor, and that I have used as the basis for deciding how to cast my vote in this election.  I have seen very little of these qualities in Governor Fitial and his lieutenant governors these past four years, and I have no reason to believe that anything will change if this administration is given a second term. 

~ John Gardner

“Yes, it is impossible — therefore, it will take a little longer.”

 ~ Paolo Lugari

November 18, 2009

Dear people of the Commonwealth,

In the days that have passed since the November 7 election, I have heard from many citizens who are deeply disappointed with the election results.  Some have concluded that the people of the CNMI are either not ready for change, or they do not want change.  Some of have told me that they are ready to give up on this community, and have asked me whether I am ready to give up as well. 

I am writing now to call on all the good people of the Commonwealth to take heart and remember what we have always known:  that change is a process.  It is often a slow process, and an uphill battle, and there will always be setbacks along this journey.  We must expect setbacks, and continue to move forward nevertheless with our eyes set firmly on our vision for a healthier, more just, and more prosperous future. 

We must also recognize signs of hope and progress when they occur.  There have indeed been significant and positive signs of change – yes, even with this election.

Looking back, we recall that in 2007 slightly over 1,000 people voted for a candidate who didn't run with a political party, didn’t promise any political jobs or favors, didn’t fundraise or spend a lot of money campaigning, and who talked about the importance of open and honest government to anyone who would listen.  

In 2009, over 2,400 people voted for that candidate in an islandwide race for the Senate – not enough to win a Senate seat, but certainly more than enough to show a significant and slowly-growing base of citizens who also want open and honest government.  Even more significantly, over two-thirds of the voters throughout the Commonwealth — more than 7,300 people – voted yes to a more transparent legislature and ratified the Open Government Act popular initiative.

I would call that progress.  It might be slower than some of us would like, but it is still progress, and it is worth celebrating.  Those 7,300 people who voted yes to the Open Government Act initiative could comprise a powerful voting bloc and a solid base for any movement for good governance in the CNMI. 

Looking ahead now, many are asking: What are our next steps?

Our most immediate next step is to participate in the runoff election on November 23, and to encourage our friends, family, and neighbors to do the same.  Our duty is to ensure that we are well-informed about the records, platforms, and characters of the two gubernatorial candidates, and that we vote carefully and wisely, with the long-term interests of our community foremost in our minds. 

Beyond November 23, and regardless of the runoff election results, we must continue to build a more active citizenry and raise our collective level of civic awareness, beginning with ourselves.  Each of is called to be the change we wish to see in our Commonwealth.  I have always believed that one of the most powerful ways to effect change is to lead by the example of our own lives.  If we aspire to be a community of great citizens and principled leaders, we must ourselves be great citizens and principled leaders, and we must raise our children to be the same: to be thinkers, to ask questions, to seek their own answers and not simply accept what they are told, and to expect more of themselves, of each other, and of their government.  It is up to all of us who desire real, meaningful change in the CNMI to do everything that we can to nurture the core values of citizenship and leadership in our children who are truly the future of this place.                     

In an open letter dated January 2007, I wrote:

“As citizens, as residents, as taxpayers of the Commonwealth, we have more power than we think – far more power than we have ever exercised.  We can do more than just complain in private about the decisions our elected officials make, and wait and hope for change in the next election.  Elected officials only have as much power as we give them, and it is up to us to demand the representation we deserve.  Protests, rallies, civil disobedience, letters, petitions, lawsuits, intelligent voting, participating in public hearings and legislative sessions, and running for office – these are just a few of the options we have for taking direct action to realize the changes that we want.” 

At the time I had named the Save Sugar Dock campaign, the 2006 Micro Games, and the Beautify CNMI! coalition as notable examples of organized community-based action.  Since then, concerned citizens and residents have also successfully pushed for the passage of the runoff election initiative, the defeat of the Saipan Casino Act, the creation of the national marine monument, the ratification of the Open Government Act popular initiative, the enactment of the Smoke Free Air Act, the passage of U.S. Public Law 110-229, and greater flexibility in the proposed federal immigration regulations.  In just the past two years alone, I have personally witnessed hundreds of residents, including young students, march up to Capitol Hill or to public forums and rallies throughout the CNMI to testify for or against proposed legislation, to call for an independent desk audit of the government, to protest mismanagement of our public utilities, to urge for the protection and wise stewardship of public lands, and to appeal to both federal and local authorities for immigration and labor reform. 

And so to answer the question that I am asked most often these days — no, I am not packing my bags and giving up on the CNMI.  My heart is here.  The 2009 election might have closed one door for me as a legislator, but I see other doors that have opened for me as a private citizen and for us as a community.  And I personally feel much freer as a citizen to keep doing what I have been doing, and more.

I owe a debt of gratitude to all who have given me the great privilege of serving in the House of Representatives, and who supported my candidacy for the Senate:  my deepest thanks for your encouragement, confidence, constructive criticism, questions, and ideas these past two years.  My term in the House and campaign for the Senate have given me much valuable insight. I see the continuing failures and shortcomings in our system of government, the progress that has been made, and the long road ahead.  And I also see that so much more can be done outside of the legislature, if there are enough caring citizens who are organized and willing to work toward a more transparent, more accountable, and more responsible government. 

We will continue to make progress as a community as long as there are still people who love this place who are willing to stick around and keep fighting the good fight.  I see no reason to give up now, or ever, on the CNMI, and every reason to continue and expand upon the work that has only just begun.

May we all continue to fight the good fight.     

Sincerely,

Tina Sablan